June 20, 2013

Martin Andelman’s solution for foreclosure

For those of you that read our posts, you know that Martin Andelman is a brilliant man and a friend of the Financial Revival Group.  While we have great respect for Martin and his awesome wife Stacey,  We believe he is missing the boat on one critical aspect of the foreclosure crisis.  Martin still believes that everyone wants to keep their house. 

In our experience, all underwater homeowners start out there.  It is easier.  We are settled in and we have built our lives around where we live.  If there is some magic pill that we could use so that everything could be made OK and we could change our situation so that it made financial sense to stay, that would be our first choice.  It doesn't exist.  The best solutions Martin talks about are still just prolonging the inevitable. 

If you are upside down in your house, you have to at least consider getting out.  But how?

With that being said, this is an article that Martin wrote that speaks to a number of issues for underwater homeowners.  It is worth a read.

I’m Not a Total Idiot, You Know.

Martin Andelman

June 11, 2013

http://mandelman.ml-implode.com

 

I’m not a total idiot. I know what many if not most people involved in the foreclosure crisis want me to write about… and I know what people don’t want to hear. You do realize that, right?

I mean, after writing 900 articles over the last four plus years… to say nothing of the hundred odd podcasts I’ve produced… and with my email and even my cell phone online… you do realize if there’s one thing I know a whole lot about it’s how this country’s homeowners think and feel about most things on most days.

So, I know… you want to read about how a homeowner won some major victory in the courts somewhere… or how someone filed and got quiet title to their property… or how a bank couldn’t figure out who owned a loan and therefore was not allowed to foreclose… or maybe even something from the hot-off-the-presses-reports about JPMorgan Chase being a criminal enterprise… or how a homeowner drove over to their local county recorder’s office, found a forged signature and won their home free and clear as a result… you want to read anything to make you feel like there’s hope… anything to make the pain and frustration stop, even if only for a few hours.

I know… and I understand.

Don’t you think I’d like to write about all of that stuff and more? I would, I assure you… in fact, after writing about the financial and foreclosure crises for going on five years, more than just about anything I’d like to post a meaningful article about something hopeful for this country’s homeowners? And since it’s always been my nature to be optimistic about things in general, you’d think I’d be able to come up with something that could at least be placed in the “positive development” column.

But, I can’t. And it’s not that I don’t want to give people what they want… it’s the lying that would be required that I can’t seem to get past, because lying would be a prerequisite to writing about any of those things in some positive way. And even if I could figure out a way to write something without outright lying, it sure as heck would require a whole lot of lily gilding at the absolute least and I don’t like doing that either.

Look, and I mean this in the nicest way possible, unless you’re the kind of person who’s suggest-able enough to be hypnotized on stage to bark like a dog after being told to relax while staring at a pocket watch for a few seconds, there’s just no way you can say anything positive about the topics previously mentioned with any sort of confidence, hopeful undertone…. or straight face.

We… and by “we” I mean “homeowners”… are NOT winning.

In point of fact, most of what’s being told to homeowners today, as related to preventing foreclosure is just one flavor shy of unadulterated crap…. a shot in the dark at the very best… and by any objective measure, the chances of anyone truly winning in court are… well, how about if we just euphemistically refer to them as being… remote… since the alternate phrase referring to a snowball’s chances of survival in the underworld would sound so harsh.

Don’t get upset with me… it’s not my fault.

Look around and the only honest conclusion one can draw is that the only path that can reasonably be considered close to an answer to foreclosure is to get your loan modified… and I know that absolutely NO ONE likes hearing that. I know some that would prefer starting chemotherapy than the loan mod process… at least as they know it. But that loan modifications offer by far the best chances for avoiding foreclosure and remaining in the home is not just my opinion… it’s an overwhelmingly, indisputable fact… based on any and all actual numbers… there is no credible question about it.

Let’s get the facts understood and out of the way…

According to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the overseer of the Making Home Affordable Program and Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”), as of February 2013…

 

  Thru Feb 2013 HAMP Activity Total
MHA 1st Lien Permanent Loan Modifications 1,285,465 1,550,396
2nd Lien Modifications Started    107,400  
HAFA Transactions Completed    126,240  
UP Forbearance Plans Started – Thru January 2013      31,291  
Trial Modifications  – All Started 2,000,224 2,000,224
                                Tier 1 1,992,633  
                                Tier 2        7,591  
Loan Modification Trials Cancelled Since June 1, 2010      66,419  
Active Trial Modifications      59,459  
Trial Modifications Since January 2013 Reporting      12,921  
     
     
     
Permanent Modifications in January 2013      15,389       15,386
Permanent Modifications Cancelled to Date    304,090      304,090
Active Permanent Modifications    862,636      862,636

1. Servicers may enter new trial modifications into the HAMP system of record at any time.

2. 774,039 cumulative including 707,620 that had trial start dates prior to June 1, 2010 when Treasury implemented a verified income requirement.

3. A permanent modification is canceled when the borrower has missed three consecutive monthly payments. Includes 11,654 loans paid off.

Now according to The Hope Now Alliance, which I understand may not be seen as the most objective source for such data, as of February 2013, there have been 6.15 million loan modifications granted since the crisis began. Hope Now also says that in January, there were about 63,540 in-house or proprietary modifications granted, which places January’s total at around 78,400.

Now, don’t get started claiming the data is wrong… my overriding point is… so what if it is? How wrong would you like to peg it? Is it off by 50 percent? That would seem highly unlikely considering the number of people following it. But even so… were that the case, it still shows more loan modifications save homes than anything else… BY FAR, right?

We’ve lost roughly 6 million homes to foreclosure since the crisis began… and no one disputes that fact. And there are roughly 45-50 million mortgages in the United States… there were 48,394 in 2005… all according to the U.S. Statistical Abstract, table 961.

So, if we’ve lost 6 million to foreclosure, then we’re just over 10 percent… and if there are another 4-5 million at risk of foreclosure, according to LPS a couple months ago… then it looks like we’re in line to lost up near 20 percent of American homes to foreclosure before this tragedy even starts to be considered over. And the only number that reaches anywhere the millions when talking about saving homes from foreclosure is that associated with loan modifications. Period. How many homeowners have saved their homes arguing in court? I’d bet you it’s not millions…. not hundreds of thousands either. I’d be totally shocked to find the number made it out of four digit category.

I don’t even know what the #2 way would be to save a home from foreclosure without moving out of it…. I would have to guess that it would be a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing? I don’t know, but I do know that its a doozy of a drop from #1 to number two on the list of ways people succeed in staying in homes saved from foreclosure.

What’s distressing is that last night, and just as one example, I listened to one of the new Internet radio programs being produced by someone who is ostensibly trying to help homeowners save their homes from foreclosure. I won’t mention any names… but for about an hour I listened to the various homeowner/guests share their ideas and strategies for saving their homes from foreclosure, while the host complemented them, saying she was taking notes, and acting almost giddy at how wonderfully they were all doing.

Not even one was anywhere close to having any possibility for success. They will all lose their homes eventually based on what they each explained they were doing to save them. Of that I am certain.

One woman from New Jersey brought up The Patriot Act as the basis for stopping a foreclosure and the show’s host became positively enthralled, saying how it was an idea she hadn’t heard before, how wonderful it was… how she was taking notes so she could share the idea with others on the show’s Website. If I had to put a number to it, I’d have to place the odds of the idea working to prevent a foreclosure at… let’s see… 4 – 7… carry the 3… hmmm… how about zero.

Listening didn’t make me mad at the show’s host because I don’t think she’s running any sort of scam… at least it didn’t seem like she was selling anything to homeowners based on what was being said. Rather, as I sat there listening, it just made me more and more sad for the homeowners who were pursuing paths that would end with their homes being lost, essentially without question.

Another homeowner guest on the program made a statement about how her bank could talk modification all they wanted, but she would only consider such an outcome under terms of her choosing, otherwise she said she would get her home free and clear because, she claimed with supposed confidence and based on signature irregularities on documents she had seen at her county recorder’s offices, they didn’t own her loan. Her voice quavered as she spoke and I could tell from my extensive experience talking with hundreds of homeowners, she was as close to breaking down in tears as she was to screaming out in anger.

That’s the sort of emotional instability that takes hold after someone gets so far behind on their mortgage that, although they might not ever admit it to anyone, they realize that there’s no way they’ll be able to catch up… that they’re already a victim of the foreclosure crisis… that they’re life is about to change as friends and family will soon look at them as “irresponsible borrowers,” and that they could at any time be waking up to their last day in the home they had never thought they would lose.

If they have kids at home, the idea of having to tell them what’s to come is near unthinkable, at least until it becomes unavoidable. They imagine pulling away on that last day in silence, no one daring to look in the rearview mirror, no one even able to turn on the radio… few things in their mind could seem less fair or inspire greater sadness. Some, during the nights when sleep becomes impossible, sit wondering whether a life insurance policies will pay off after suicide.

And it’s against such a backdrop of extreme emotional trauma that one’s mind either surrenders to what it views as an insurmountable battle, or it becomes susceptible to believing in things that mitigate the shame and reduce the stress… things that under different circumstances one would at the very least find the need to independently verify them before accepting them as true. Many in this mode, however, go to great lengths to avoid exposure to any information that dispels what they very much want to believe. Modifications: Pro or Con.

Okay, so I know some will try to tell you that loan modifications can’t work because you’ll have a clouded title for whatever reason and never end up owning your home even after you’ve paid off the modified mortgage, but if you want my answer to someone who says that sort of thing… here it is:

I don’t believe you… I think you’re wrong… and I don’t believe that story for a moment.

No, I’m not a lawyer, thank the good Lord, but to answer this question I’m confident that a law degree isn’t required. In fact, it could be a hindrance or impediment to clear thinking.

I don’t care what anyone says on this point… I’m saying that if you pay off your mortgage in 20, 30 or 40 years from now, there’s no way that any judge in this country rules that you don’t own the home for which you just finished paying. And I don’t care if an assignment was signed by Mickey Mouse, notarized by Donald Duck and filed up your butt… you’ll still own that house once you’ve made all the payments… period.

That’s just what I believe. If you want to believe otherwise that’s up to you… but, lawyer or not… I think you’re nuts.

The truth is you should hope I’m wrong and it does happen… you should hope that someday when you’ve made all your mortgage payments, Bank of America or JPMorgan Chase or whoever you’re “bank” is at that point, tries to get away with not sending you the release of the lien on your property… you should pray that’s exactly what happens to you at 70 or 80 something years old after paying on your mortgage each month for 30 or 40 years. Because if that does actually happen… if you actually get that lucky… you’re going to find yourself in front of a judge that’s going to hear what’s happened and be hopping mad at the bank standing on the other side of the courtroom.

After that, I’d have to guess that you’re not going to have to worry about working as a “Greeter” at Wal-Mart in your golden years… in fact, I’d say that would be about the right time to call your travel agent and book that cruise you’ve always dreamed of taking because you’re going home a winner.

And I’m not going to argue with anyone about this point, okay? There have been millions of loans modified in this country since 2008, and if you think any of those people are about to pay their monthly mortgage payments for the next so many decades and then be told they’re out in the cold and don’t own their homes, you’re just fruit loopy.

Where’s all this good news coming from?

It’s nothing short of astonishing, but this country is positively awash in positive economic news… it’s like it’s oozing from every pore of our national being. And what’s so amazing about the whole thing is that everything is better every day… even without anything measurable actually improving. It’s like a magic economy in which we’re told that everything is getting happier by the moment, while no one knows anyone who’s happier and everyone continues their own personal downward slide towards the poverty line.

I remember feeling like this at the end of the first quarter in 2009. Do you remember back then… it was like six months after Treasury Secretary Paulson and Fed Chief Ben Bernanke assured everyone in Congress that our global financial system was only hours away from complete collapse… hundreds of billions were needed immediately… there wasn’t even time to tell us how the money would be used. Don’t ask questions, you’ll get us all killed… now write a check and let me get on with saving the planet Earth.

Remember all that? Right. So, then six months later, remember how everything had gotten better… Wall Street was having record bonuses again… we had been saved by… a TARP? Just like when I went camping once when I was about 11 years old and it ended up pouring rain the whole weekend. Thank God one of the adults had brought a TARP. I don’t know what we would have done otherwise… probably all would have died… ummm… from all that rain… in July… I guess… maybe… it could happen.

What the heck am I babbling about? I don’t know… but what do you care? Why does my TARP story make any less sense than the one Secretary Paulson told us in October of 2008? Besides, by the end of the first quarter of 2009, everything was hunky dory again, and I remember writing that if whatever had happened was the sort of thing that was going to be fixed by the end of Q1 – 2009, then next time something like that happens, I’d be okay if the government just kept the whole thing to themselves and just woke me after things were fixed.

If it’s going to be fixed in six months or less, just leave me out of the whole “news” thing… I don’t really need to know, I’m often running more than six months behind on stuff anyway. I don’t even know who won on American Idol in 2011 yet… and don’t tell me… I’ve got it on TiVo to watch. Next time, just handle the Fall’s end-of-the-world-type-problem-that-gets-solved-in-six-months… and give yourself a pat on the back in the Spring.

So, then we were humming along just fine for a few months until nothing changed and then everything went straight off a cliff while I was napping on a Saturday, I’m pretty sure. And then after that things were bad… really bad… and getting worse… somewhere… I’m not sure where… nothing has really changed for me this whole time. My house keeps dropping in value, but once the credit markets are frozen and you’re underwater by six figures… what difference does that make?

It’s harder to make as much money as I used to, but that’s not that big a deal… I just spend less, work more, and make sure my life insurance premiums are current no matter what. I figure if I die next Tuesday at lunch… it’ll be perfect.

I guess one thing is different… our president helps me make my picks for The Final Four… and that’s about all he does really. He’s cool though… and I wish I was a little bit taller, I wish I was a baller, I wish I had a friend with a phone I could call her. I think that was a song from a few years back, but I’m sorry… now it reminds me of the leader of the free world.

I didn’t vote for him this last time… in fact, I didn’t vote at all this last time. Why? Because I was okay with just leaving the position open for the next four years while we looked around. I don’t think we needed to fill the spot for a couple of years. There’s no chance of our government accomplishing much good or bad in a couple of years without a president.

I would have been okay putting a toaster in the Oval Office for four years. Why? Because then… we’d have toast. I would have liked toast. CNN could announce that today it’s “Rye,” and I could have said to myself… “Now, that sounds delicious.”

And what do we have now? No toast. It sucks, really.

Instead we’ve got… well, come on now… what have we got? Oh, that’s right… we’ve got GOOD NEWS breaking out all over the place, or at least in all the places I’m not with all the people I don’t know or never meet.

Foreclosures aren’t down, housing isn’t up… but more people are apparently stupid.

Real estate prices do not just magically re-inflate themselves by the month. No, they do not… ever. Neither do they fall that fast either. Real estate prices behave nothing like a Duncan Yo-Yo. No one ever puts their home on the market for $300,000… and then a week or even a month later lowers the asking price to $200,000. Never happens… unless it’s someone on crack, I suppose. That’s why housing prices, when they decline, they decline gradually and often not in a straight line.

They don’t go shooting up by 25 percent in a matter of months either. Not even during the unprecedented bubble of 2003-2006 did they do that. No, they did not. I know… you heard a story from your cousin… but your cousin was full of crap and is broke now anyway, so why are we listening to him or her. For housing prices to increase, the demand for homes has to increase. And because homes cost a lot, for people to express their demand for homes, there has to be plenty of credit available… and jobs help too… people generally shy away from buying homes when they don’t have jobs… historically speaking anyway.

Well, none of those things has changed over this past year… except maybe to have worsened. Credit markets are as tight as ever… the only jobs we’ve created are minimum wage and part time, and we’ve got five million people in default awaiting foreclosure and thinking at least on occasion about killing themselves or someone else.

If you’re between 20-30… the only way you’re getting a good job is if you can hit the three-pointer, you become a sex worker, or your parents own a bank. And besides that, you’ve got enough student loan debt to choke a doctorate in computer science, so you’re not buying anything that costs more than you’ll likely make over the next 20 years.

And we’ve lost more than six million homes to foreclosure. I think based on that number alone, it would be safe to say that 10 million people are spending less than they used to, right? Can we all agree on that one teensey-weensey piece of economic brilliance? Losing six million homes to foreclosure and property values falling by 30 percent or more probably hasn’t done all that much to increasing the tax base in any given state either, right? Or, should we commission some people with degrees Piled Higher and Deeper to study the situation for a couple years before we jump to any conclusions on that point?

Our central bank buys 90 percent of our national debt these days, and speaking of that crazy bald guy with the beard whose quantitatively squeezing $80 billion worth of something in and out of our money supply, like he’s working the paste in and out of a toothpaste tube on a monthly basis. Have you heard how “repurchase agreements” work?

Bernanke loans money to the banks and broker/dealers who give him various pieces of paper as collateral for a few weeks and then they pay the money back and Bernanke gives them their worthless pieces of paper back and next month he does the whole thing all over again… and somehow THAT makes the stock market go up… and some people are actually calling and emailing me to ask why what he’s doing does what it does?

Shut up, shut up, shut up. It doesn’t do anything, just like it sounds like it couldn’t possibly do anything… at least nothing lasting or significant. If you want to accomplish more in the long run, you could just get drunk and pretend things were better. That would do more for the problem you were having in the long run than what we’ve got going on.

And yet, Warren Buffett, just a few days ago was quoted as saying:

The U.S. economy might be “dead in the water” without the stimulus provided by the Federal Reserve under Chairman Ben Bernanke, according to Warren Buffett, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway. “I think very cheap money makes things happen, it makes asset values higher. When asset values are higher, people do have a greater propensity to spend,” Buffett told CNBC. “I think Bernanke has sort of carried the load himself during this period.”

Buffett thinks Bernanke has, talking about the economy of the United States of America, “carried the load himself?” And I’m supposed to somehow consider what’s been going on “good news?” One guy is carrying our collective load and we’re doing better? Better than what, for heaven’s sake? Unless the one guy carrying our economy is wearing an ‘S’ on his chest, and can actually move faster than a speeding bullet and is more powerful than a locomotive… able to leap tall buildings in a single bound… then Buffet’s statement terrifies me to the point that I may pee in my pants at any moment.

According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. GDP actually contracted at an annual rate of 0.1 percent during the fourth quarter of 2012, marking the first contraction in the official numbers in more than three years… and if you’re technically oriented enough to follow John Williams’ site, shadowstats.com, you’ll find things are much worse than even that. And, Europe’s EU, it’s worth mentioning, is positively imploding. I’m not sure, but what would you like to bet that Greece… the sovereign nation is worth less than “Grease”… the musical. I don’t know if that’s actually true on paper or not, but I know which one I’d rather own… how about you?

Foreclosures aren’t down because of “good news,” because there is no significant “good news.”

New state laws in some states and delays by servicers and homeowners are temporarily making foreclosures appear to be decreasing. I promise you that the foreclosure crisis is not one of those things that they can make go away in any number of months. People hear prices are up and in this market, Realtors will list almost anything.

I found a Realtor on my lawn the other day, asking me if we wanted to sell our house. Can you imagine that? I mean, door-to-door… would you like to sell your house? That’s got to be a lot harder than selling magazine subscriptions or Girl Scout cookies. But our housing markets are “cooking,” right? Back to normal… at least a third of the sales are all cash in most states… and in some states HALF?

A real estate market? I’d say not.

And so, I really am sorry that I can’t write more “happy homeowner”stories of how Mr. & Mrs. Jones are prevailing in courts across this land and ending up getting their homes fro free because of something being wrong that involves a signature… or ten signatures. It’s just not happening.

You don’t have to like what I write all the time, but you ignore it at your own peril. Take your power back and get on a track that makes the best of a terrible situation… regain control of your life… they may be able to take your money… but they can’t take your time unless you let them.

And I’m not telling anyone not to defend their homes through whatever means they deem necessary. I’m just saying that you should know the facts of the path on which you’ve decided to travel.

Mandelman out.

Warren Blasts FHFA for Blocking Short Sales

Sen. Elizabeth Warren is taking the Federal Housing Finance Agency to task, criticizing the conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for opposing short sale deals designed to keep original borrowers in their homes.

In an op-ed published this week in the Dorchester Reporter, a community newspaper based in the Dorchester section of Boston, the Massachusetts Democrat said the FHFA "has blocked the way" to such deals through what is known as an "arm's-length" policy.

Warren highlighted certain short sales where a borrower's family or friends, or local nonprofit organizations, seek to buy an underwater home at fair market value and then arrange for the original homeowner to keep the property either by repurchasing it or paying rent.

"The mortgage company gets the same amount as in a sale to strangers, but the homeowner has a last chance to save the family home. This is a win-win for both sides—more money for the mortgage lender and a family that saves their home," she wrote. "But the FHFA flatly refuses these deals. The agency's so-called 'arm's-length' policy means that it will instead demand that the family be moved out and the home be sold at a lower-priced foreclosure sale."

The agency's reasoning, Warren said, is to prevent "sweetheart insider deals that benefit the homeowners at the expense of Fannie and Freddie."

"But that makes no sense when the house is sold at market value or when people affiliated with the homeowner put in the highest bid to save the home," she said. "In those cases, the identity of the bidder makes no meaningful difference because Fannie and Freddie's bottom line stays the same. And every time a family stays in a home—rather than being pushed into foreclosure—the neighborhood does better and the overall housing market does better—both of which help the value of all the other mortgages that FHFA holds."

She described the plight of a specific Dorchester resident, Ramon Suero, and his family who hit hard times and fell behind on payments.

"The situation was grim, but a non-profit called Boston Community Capital thought the Suero family was a good risk. The group made a cash offer to buy the property at more than its market value for the purpose of selling it back to the family," Warren wrote. "The non-profit recognized that Ramon and Rosanna could eventually make the payments and were hard-working people who simply caught a bad break.

"Following the FHFA's rigid rule, however, Freddie Mac refused the deal. Instead of doing everything it could to help keep residents in their homes, the FHFA bent over backwards to have the Sueros thrown out. This is exactly the opposite of what should be happening."

But in an emailed statement, an FHFA spokesperson said short sale deals can be exposed to elevated risks of fraud.

"Short sales are, by their nature, vulnerable to manipulation and FHFA's policy requiring that they be conducted at 'arm's-length' is in keeping with industry standard and is intended to avoid conflicts of interest and fraud," the spokesperson said. "FHFA has worked very hard to keep families in their homes, as evidenced by the more than 2.3 million loan modifications that have been completed since FHFA took over as conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

The only reason they care about who buys the house is that they want as many homeowners as possible to keep paying on their homes.  We, the underwater homeowners are the last domino to fall and the only ones that didn't get bailed out.  Their plan is for us to hold up the rest of the dominos.  Don't do it.  Get out while you still can. 

CLICK HERE for original article on National Mortgage News

Finally! The Extension to the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act

mortgage debt relief act extensionMany of the members of the Financial Revival Group have been waiting for this extension to happen and know what it is about.  As we have been discussing in our Member Emails and in our Monthly Members Only Meetings, we fully expected this extension to take place.  We even expressed to you that we thought it would simply be an add-on to the fiscal cliff bill, which indeed it was.

It is official.  The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act has been extended through the end of 2013. 

We still have more to do because we think this bill should have been extended for three years, not just one.  However, with all of the lobbying that went on from many different groups, we don’t believe that further extensions of this bill will be an issue. 

Now, for the benefit of our readers who are not members of the Financial Revival Group and don’t know what this act is about, here is a quick explanation.

If you owe a debt and that debt is forgiven, you have received a financial benefit from that transaction.  When the creditor finally gives up or settles the debt for less than is owed and stops further action to collect the debt, they have officially taken a loss.  The IRS says that since you actually received the money and didn’t fully pay it back, you received a “gift” from that creditor and that “gift” amount is taxable as normal income. 

In the past, we saw this mostly with credit card companies and other uncollectable debts.  If you settled a $20,000 credit card debt for $8,000 you and the IRS would receive a form 1099 for $12,000.  (The IRS gets a copy to make sure you include with your next tax return)  You would have to pay income tax on that $12,000.  If you were in a 15% tax bracket, your tax bill the following year would increase by $1,800.  Not a bad trade by most standards. 

With the continuing housing collapse, we are seeing this same event in real estate but with much larger numbers.  So to help out underwater homeowners, the Bush Administration passed the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act in 2007 that says that if your bank suffers a loss on your house, in certain cases, you would be exempt from the tax.  This law expired at the end of 2010 but was extended through the end of 2012 by the Obama Administration.  Now the bill has been extended again through the end of 2013.

This law applies to you if:

  1. Your bank takes a loss on your house as a result of a foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, short sale, loan modification or principle reduction.
  2. The event is completed by the end of 2013.  That means your foreclosure, short sale etc. has to be finalized by the end of the year. 
  3. The property is your primary residence.
  4. The money forgiven was used to buy, build or substantially improve the property.
  5. The forgiven amount is less than $2 Million.  Hey, movie stars and basketball players need a break too.

 So, if you have been waiting for the extension of this bill to make a move on your underwater house, now is the time.  Nothing is quick in this process, no matter which way you decide to go.  The first thing you need to do is to find out what all of your options look like and how they will affect you moving forward. 

If you or someone you know wants to find out about every option you have available, you can start with a free 15 minute consultation with the Financial Revival Group.  This free, no obligation phone call will help you get your immediate questions answered and put you on the right track based on your particular situation.  Call us at 425-259-2600 to schedule your consultation or CLICK HERE to email us. 

THEY are talking up the housing market. Do you really believe them? Don’t!

I am so frustrated by all of the talking up of the housing market.  More people are going to be hurt financially by this intentional deceit by the infamous "They" we have talked about in previous posts.  We got here because we have been lied to throughout this whole housing collape.  There is a lot more pain to come in housing.  Just because you have held out this long does not mean you are going to make it through what it still awaits us no matter what "They" say. 

The piece below is a full reprint of a post by Martin Andelman of Mandelman Matters.  Martin and I have had many discussions about this topic and he puts it very well so I wanted you to see this. 

 

Talking Up the Housing Market? Yada, Yada, Yada… Talk is Cheap

By Martin Andelman

Now I get it… our plan is to try to TALK the housing market up.

Apparently, and I just realized this today, some people think they have figured out that if we just keep talking about how the housing market is recovering… it will respond by recovering.  It’s positively brilliant.  Someone should really let the EU countries know about this strategy because they could really use it, since absolutely nothing else is working in the least.

Hey, you guys in Spain… instead of all that rioting, try saying this over and over again in the newspapers and on television: “El mercado de la vivienda se está recuperando… El mercado de la vivienda se está recuperando!”  That should pretty much handle it.  See, problem solved… glad I could help.

And you guys in Greece, try saying whatever this sounds like: “Η αγορά κατοικίας είναι ανάκτηση.”  And your welcome, by the way.

Okay, look… talk is cheap.  And the strategy of talking about how the housing market is recovering in order to actually make anything recover, although hysterical, is just plain stupid.

On the other hand, since it’s obvious that essentially no one, present company excluded, has the foggiest idea of what to do differently, or is willing to even try doing anything differently, then I suppose talk is all we’ve got.  So, go ahead chatty Cathys… blather on.  Besides, I’ve gotten much better at ignoring you.

 

 

The Scale of the Crisis at the End of 2012

As of the end of this year, we will have lost FIVE MILLION homes to foreclosure… and 10 MILLION MORE American households have faced the prospect of foreclosure since the crisis began during the third quarter of 2006.  Add to those the numbers the 5.3 MILLION NOW in the foreclosure pipeline, meaning they have already received a foreclosure notice or are over 30 days delinquent… and 3.3 MILLION of them are over 90 days delinquent or already in pre-sale inventory.

Then stop to consider that there are only 50 million homes carrying a mortgage in this country… and then do the math.  You shouldn’t need a calculator to know that the answer to any equation comes out CRISIS of historical proportion no matter what the talkers are talking about today.

In addition, it’s interesting that no one wants to talk about the COMPLETED BANK REPOSSESSIONS continuing at the rate of about 50,000 A MONTH, with foreclosure starts at 100,000 A MONTH.

But, the housing market is recovering, the housing market is recovering… well yada, yada, yada and a blah, blah, blah.

 

 

First Time Buyer Demand Falling

One of the only legitimate sources of demand for homes in this country would be that provided by first time buyers.  Think about it… they can’t be underwater because they don’t already own a home.  So, with at least a third of the country’s homeowners underwater and unable to move, our first time buyers are about the only growing demographic we’ve got, since we’re certainly not growing investors in any sort of hurry.

The latest edition of Fannie Mae’s Housing Insights, however, in which Fannie economists examined the data shows that the decline in the homeownership rate over the last four years has been particularly pronounced for young households.

According to Mortgage News Daily on November 15, 2012, “five years after the start of the housing bust American households continue to shift from homeownership to being renters.”  And why this would be any sort of surprise to anyone is beyond me.

The particularly bad news is that homeownership among the younger demographic groups dropped the most in each of the last five years.  In fact, overall homeownership among those between age 25-44 has declined at double the rate of the overall decline.

The only age group that did not seen a decline in homeownership in 2010 and 2011 is the age 75+ group.

But don’t worry, I’m certainly confident that this country’s OCTOGENARIANS (people in their 80s, just to make sure everyone’s with me) are going to save our housing market… so attention all talkers, better get ready to start talking about that.

Why are young people not buying homes like they used to?  Well, gee… let’s see if we can’t figure that out without having to look anything up, shall we?

Well, there’s the issue of student loan debt, which has become such a scam that I may have to devote an entire blog to it in the near future.  And then there’s the need for 20 percent down payments and 760 credit scores… unless we’re talking FHA loans, in which case we’re talking about 20 percent defaults and increasing insurance premiums and tightening underwriting requirements.

Oh, something else… there’s the relatively higher unemployment numbers among the younger demographics, twice as high as the average in many areas.  And then there’s the fact that young people AREN’T STUPID, so one might imagine that since AT LEAST 20 MILLION of them have watched their elders either lose homes or be at risk of losing homes, it might just be that many are in no hurry to repeat the apparent mistakes of the past.

Ya’ think?  Or do the MORONS reading this think we need to conduct a study to figure that out too?

 

 

Being Underwater

Consider the chart from Zillow below to get an idea of how the underwater problem can do nothing but significantly reduce future demand.  Zoom in on it to read it closely, but if you don’t have your glasses, the blue bars are underwater homes by city, and the red bars are delinquent underwater homes by city.

And that’s what Zillow thinks.  Just imagine what the truth of the situation is, because you know it’s not better than Zillow’s.  Just by factoring in the percentage underwater when including real estate sales commissions would take all of those numbers up by 6 percent, right?  Yes, right.

 

Foreclosures to Come

Another factor that makes talkers mute and much of their data moot is how state laws have created markets where foreclosures are delayed and hanging like the Sword of Damocles over their respective markets.

In case you’re a little rusty on your legends from classical Greek culture, Roman philosopher Cicero uses this story to reach the conclusion that virtue is all you need to live a happy life, when he asks the question, “Does not Dionysius seem to have made it sufficiently clear that there can be nothing happy for the person over whom some fear always looms?

Look at the chart below to see how Nevada’s new law, AB 284, which took effect in October of 2011, has impacted servicers filing Notices of Default.  It’s not a chart showing problems being solved, it’s just a study in kicking the proverbial can down the road.

 

 

As Phillip Gusterson, writing for Seeking Alpha on November 27th, said in his article titled, “Dark Forces Manipulate the Housing Market, “AB284 has dramatically reduced foreclosures in Las Vegas. The result is a lesson in basic economics, with a drop in supply leading to an increase in prices. But what is clear to everyone is that the supply is artificially constrained, and a second lesson in economics could be around the corner: an increase in supply will lead to lower prices.”

He goes on to point out what should be obvious, “AB284 did not remove the need to foreclose on these properties, it just removed the ability to do it, so now one year later we have at least 24,000 units that should have been filed on, but were not because lawmakers in a run up to a general election decided to manipulate the market.”

I don’t agree with everything Mr. Gusterson has to say, but on that point there’s absolutely no chance that he’s even a little bit wrong.  When supply goes down, prices always go up… and the reverse is also true… welcome to Econ 101.

And if that fundamental truth wasn’t enough to cause those thinking that Las Vegas is already at the bottom of the market to pause, Gusterson also points out that, “Las Vegas also has a disproportionate share of ARM mortgages. When interest rates inevitably rise that this will cause a further wave of defaults just as the market shows signs of genuine recovery stimulated by economic growth.”

Notices of Default are increasing steadily over the last few months, however,  which just shows that the banks will ultimately figure out how to foreclose within the current legislative requirements.  As Gusterson’s article opines, “… it does seem logical that the significant market force of 75,000 delinquents will eventually overcome the barriers that politicians throw up to stem the tide.”

He figures that banks will use some combination of “improved administration, short sales, bulk note sales, bulk REO sales, and judicial foreclosures to operate within the post-AB284 environment to work through the foreclosures, and that the post-MERS environment will encourage them to increase the rate of foreclosure.”  

Once again, he is most assuredly correct, but he may be missing one additional factor, which is that the legislature, all too aware of AB 284’s draconian and utterly paralyzing effect on the market, may very well act to weaken the law in order to make it somewhat easier to foreclose in the future.

Lastly, consider that in 2102, according to the Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors, almost 55 percent of all homes sold in Southern Nevada were bought as ALL CASH deals.  And you don’t have to be any sort of economic expert to realize that we just don’t have anywhere near enough people able to pay cash for homes to create any sort of actual recovery.  (I’m not going to bother sourcing that statement, if you don’t instinctively know it to be the case, you’re an idiot and reading the wrong blog, so scat. I have no time for you.)

 

 

What Is Going Up?

The only segment of any housing market going up is at the bottom of the market, where investors are prone to bid against each other, afraid that they’ll lose out.  It’s the same sort of greedy mentality that takes hold at auctions, where I’ve seen people pay more for things than they would have to if buy them at their retail price.

The simple fact is that the markets aren’t acting rationally, and I’m sure part of it is that some of the talking causes irrational things to happen.  For example, Dr. Housing Bubble, who follows Southern California’s housing market better than anyone, points out that while “home sales are up by 8 percent year-over-year, during the same period, the median home price fell by 3.7 percent.”

That’s just great… as demand goes up, price falls?  Try answering questions on an economics exam that way and you’ll fail the test sure as shootin’.  Again, according to Dr. Housing Bubble

“If you want to see delusion in action take a look at Zillow’s “make me move” option and you will see it in full force.  Even with mortgage rates at record low prices and very generous products like FHA loans that only require 3.5 percent down, the market seems to be moving lower in mid-tier to upper-tier areas.”

Well, obviously that part of the market needs a stern talking to, wouldn’t you say?  Get to work talkers… I expect to see some yabbering and in a hurry.

 

 

Talk is Cheap

The fact that there are properties at the very bottom that appear to have increased in price by a few points is no indication that housing is recovering.

Remember, the underwater problem is just as it was, so demand can’t increase because half the market can’t move.  And remember that, for the most part, no one is selling their home unless they have to, so the supply is reduced because no one wants to compete with foreclosures and short sales when selling their home into what is already the worst housing market in 70 years.

If people were selling, without demand increasing, then prices would fall even further as the impact of increased supply and competition could produce no other outcome. And there’s just nowhere that demand can come from as long as we’re pretending that our economy and housing market are recovering, and therefore doing NOTHING about ANYTHING.

Our situation related to unemployment in this country is nothing short of horrific… we’ve got at least 5.5 MILLION people out of work for over six months.  In California, the published rate is over 11 percent, and that’s not even a fully loaded number.  And we haven’t created anything but part-time and minimum wage jobs over the last four years, so even if working, EVERYONE is making less.

What’s amazing to me is that we’re not even pressuring our elected officials to do anything.  Other than a few Occupy people camping on lawns until they get arrested, the only thing we’re doing is kvetching on Facebook and pacing through sleepless nights.

Here’s an excerpt from a Rolling Stone article from last June, written by Jeff Tietz…

To aid Santa Barbara’s large homeless population, local activists launched the Safe Parking program and since the Great Recession began, the number of lots and participants in the program has doubled. By 2009, formerly middle-class people like Janis Adkins had begun turning up – teachers and computer repairmen and yoga instructors seeking refuge in the city’s parking­ lots. 

Safe-parking programs in other cities have experienced a similar influx of middle-class exiles, and their numbers are not expected to decrease anytime soon. 

It can take years for unemployed workers from the middle class to burn through their resources – savings, credit, salable belongings, home equity, loans from family and friends. 

Some 5.4 million Americans have been without work for at least six months, and an estimated 750,000 of them are completely broke or heading inexorably toward destitution. In California, where unemployment remains at 11 percent, middle-class refugees like Janis Adkins are only the earliest arrivals. “She’s the tip of the iceberg,” says Nancy Kapp, the coordinator of the Safe Parking program. 

“There are many people out there who haven’t hit bottom yet, but they’re on their way – they’re on their way.”

 

Afraid?  Terrified?  Yeah, well me too. 

It’s happening all around us, most of us see the signs of the cracks widening every day.  But too many of us are still in denial, they don’t want to talk about it, they’d rather just listen to the happy talk crowd who are constantly trying to talk our economy back to health.

My wife noticed that I didn’t bother to vote this year and asked me why.  I replied that for all our president is doing, I would have been okay with leaving the position open for the next four years… you know, just not fill it until someone worth voting for comes along.  But it now occurs to me that President Obama fits in  perfectly with what’s going on.  If talking the economy up will somehow work, then I’ve changed my mind and he’s the perfect guy for that job.  (Hahaha… get it?)

Here’s the real deal, however… while you might be able to get ME up by talking to me, housing isn’t going anywhere but sideways and down no matter what anyone says.  Bet on it.

Mandelman out. 

Public Exposure TV Calls on Our Expert for Updated Advice on the Housing Collapse.

This is a video of our Founder, Howard Bono being interviewed on Public Exposure TV.  Howard is a return guest on this show and has become their "Go To Guy" on issues related to the housing collapse. 

 

 

You can talk to the exert about your particular underwater mortgage situation by calling 425-259-2600.  We offer a free 15 minute consultation where you can get your immediate questions answered.  No cost and no obligation.

 

Attorneys general request extended tax relief for distressed homeowners

Did you know that if you do a short sale, foreclosure or settle a 2nd mortgage you can get out of the debt on your underwater home that you could still owe the IRS a lot of money?

While many states allow homeowners to get out of their houses without the threat of the bank coming after them for the money the bank lost, the IRS can still haunt you for lots of money in taxes.  Whatever money the bank loses on your underwater house is looked upon by the IRS as a gift from the bank and requires you to pay income tax on it. 

Currently there is a law in place that exempts most homeowners from this tax.  However, this law exprires on December 31, 2012.  The Mortgage Foregiveness Debt Relief Act began with the Bush administration and extended in the Obama administration via the Dodd-Frank bill.  This makes it bi-partisan but needs to be extended.  We have brought this to your attention in previous posts and to support the extension of this important bill. We are gettting some additional help.

Below is an article published by Housing Wire.  Written by Megan Hopkins. 

Four attorneys general are leading the fight to extend tax relief to homeowners who faced financial hardship such as a foreclosure and were granted mortgage debt forgiveness.

Attorneys General Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, Lisa Madigan of Illinois, Pam Bondi of Florida, George Jepsen of Connecticut and Martha Coakley of Massachusetts lead the national effort of 41 state attorneys general calling on Congress to extend the exclusion, in place since 2007. Various government agencies and industry trade groups began fighting for an extension as early as April.

If Congress does not answer, the tax relief efforts put in place by the Mortgage Debt Relief Act will expire on Dec. 31. This federal act essentially dismisses a distressed homeowner’s mortgage debt in the case of a foreclosure, short sale or loan modification.

With the recent push toward more principal reductions via the national settlement between state AGs and the nation's biggest mortgage servicers, hundreds of thousands could be impacted. The $20 bilion-plus settlement outlines consumer-relief mandates and servicing requirements for the nation's largest mortgage servicers.

“Failure to extend this tax relief would hurt the very families we set out to help in the national foreclosure settlement,” Illinois' Madigan said. “We need to do everything we can to encourage — not deter — struggling homeowners to seek help to stay in their homes.”

The AGs wrote a letter to the leaders of the U.S. House and Senate requesting an extension. The letter noted that if the $25 billion national settlement does expire, homeowners would face up to $1.3 billion in tax increases over two years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

"Unless Congress acts, any debt relief to be provided in 2013 under the national mortgage settlement, as well as other mortgage debt relief programs, will likely be considered taxable income," said Masto.

Added Coakley, “This tax relief is critical for helping struggling homeowners stay in their homes as we work to repair the damage from the foreclosure crisis. We urge Congress to ensure families are not hit with an unexpected tax bill when seeking a loan modification.”

More than 4,000 homeowners had received mortgage debt relief for an average savings of $67,457 per homeowner in Coakley's state of Massachusetts since the settlement was signed earlier this year.

An extension is included in the Family and Business Tax Cut Certainty Act of 2012 (S. 3521), which recently passed out of the Senate Finance Committee with bipartisan support.

It only took 15 million Underwater Homeowners to get Underwater added to the Dictionary

Websters Dictionary just published a partial list of new words and definitions they are adding for 2012. There are 15 on the list and I wrote a little story about Bob, an Underwater Homeowner using all 15. I hope you enjoy it.

This is the story of my friend Bob who had an aha moment the other day about his underwater house. You see Bob did all of the right things. At least that is what he thought. He bought a house he could afford and lived within his means. He made all of his payments on time thinking at some point, he could relax a little and work on his bucket list. He thought about how the government could have fixed all of this housing mess by using that big bailout to help homeowners.  The housing collapse was proving to be the game changer in his well laid financial plans.  

He loudly dropped an f-bomb as he thought about how Wall Street and the Banksters conned the politicians into giving the money to them instead. Those crooks convinced the politicians that the systemic risk was just too great and that if they didn’t get the money, more banks would fall. Just because the politicians believed the banks were too big to fail, he felt they were not too big to jail and that some of them should be put away. He just couldn’t think about this anymore.  

Trying to figure this out wore him out mentally and he was gassed. He knew he needed to do something with this house but he didn’t even know where to start. He remembered an ad he heard a few weeks back about a company that helped underwater homeowners like him, but he couldn’t remember the web address to go look. It was something about a bailout. He promised himself that when that web address came to him that he would go check it out since he always has a computer close by.

Bob is a bit of a computer nerd and he also admits to being a Gleek. One of his favorite ways to unwind is to grab an energy drink and his guitar and head for his man cave to watch the TV show Glee. He loves their latest mash-up and is even working on a few of his own. This is a good break for him because he works constantly building his business. When the show is over, he realizes that he has some work to do. (Whoever said that if you own a business you didn’t build it yourself, must have never tried it.)

The computer nerd part of Bob is a smart guy, a few years ago he started his company, Trip C. It stands for Copernicium Cloud Computing. He liked the name because Copernicium is a brand new element and cloud computing is a new technology that Bob knows will continue to grow. Somebody threw out the nickname Trip C in a meeting early on in the company's history and the name stuck.

Bob finishes the project he needed to get done and realizes that he is getting hungry. He is also fighting this earworm that has been in his head all day. The song is Las Vegas Turnaround by Hall & Oates. The song makes him think of Hanna, his girlfriend who is a flight attendant and won’t be back for a couple of days. So he is a little lonely, hungry, gassed and still mad about his underwater house. “What is the web address for that company?” My bailout? Bail me out? He knows it will come to him.

Food! That is what he needs now. He heads down to his favorite gastropub for some Mango fish tacos and a microbrew. He chooses a table in the back because he knows Hanna is at her hotel by now and they can do a little sexting while he eats. This is the little game they play when she is out of town. Hanna tells him about her flight and tells him that she is upset because she said, “ I had to get my own mail out of the mailbox before I left because my roommate just leaves it there.” My own mail out… That’s it!  He remembered the web address. My Own Bailout.  WWW.MYOWNBAILOUT.COM.

That is the company that can help me with my underwater house. He quickly says goodbye to Hanna so he can go online and find those people that can help him figure out what to do with his house. www.myownbailout.com. In the process of this story he got started creating his strategy to deal with his underwater house and he used all 15 new words in the Webster dictionary. What a successful day.

Thanks for bearing with me on this. It is just a mental exercise and a plug for those that need some help too. If you want to see the Webster Dictionary article on some of the new words in their dictionary go to www.merriam-webster.com/info/newwords12.htm

Guest Post – Shadow & Ghost Inventory Quantified

This is a direct reprint of a post by Mark Hanson.  I don't know him but I get his posts from time to time.  His writing in this post is a bit cryptic but he is right on the money. 

"As far as the housing market goes, if you are waiting for a recovery, you probably won't see it in your lifetime."

8/14 Mark Hanson…

”Shadow” & “Ghost” Inventory Quantified

by Mark on August 14, 2012

Those estimating “shadow” inventory at levels inconsistent with a multi-year drag on housing are “definitionally” challenged.  Moreover, they have bad data.

How I see is — based on the data and simple math — we have at least 10 -years of distressed supply to work through based on the past two years average of monthly distressed sales demand.

 

Demand

1)  Annualized Existing Home Sales 4.4mm units

a)  3.1mm units are non-distresssed

b) 1.3mm units are from the foreclosure stock or short sales

Bottom line: Demand for distressed supply is 110k per month on average.

 

 Supply (Visible, Shadow, Ghost)

Visible Supply

1)  Listed Supply – 2.4 million Nation Assoc of Realtor listings

2)  REO – 300k to 400k Foreclosures

**this is where most “analysts” stop looking for supply.

 

“Shadow Supply”

1)  60-days late or in Foreclosure – 5 to 6 million units

2)  short sales – 600k annually

3)  modified legacy loans – 6 million (I call mods “new-vintage, higher-leverage, worse-than-Subprime loans).  Note, mods redefault at a faster pace than legacy Subprime loans defaulted in 2006 to 2008.

Bottom line, there are 11.6mm high risk loans. If half liquidate over the next 3 years it means ~2mm per year in distressed supply in a market only proven to absorb 1.3mm units.

**Some better analysts go as far as here but they don’t grasp the “denominator effect” and try to divide total sales of 4.4 million into the “distressed” supply. That’s not accurate because only 25% of the demand is for distressed supply.

 

“Ghost” Supply 20 million to 30 million borrowers/houses (not mutually exclusive meaning one borrower can belong to multiple cohorts)

1)  “Effective” Negative Equity – 25 million borrowers / houses.  These borrowers are dead to the housing market, as they don’t have the equity to pay a Realtor 6% to sell and put 20% down on a new house.  They were once the most active participants, the repeat buyers. Now they are “zombie homeowners”.

2)  Impaired Credit – 28 million borrowers.  These are borrowers with “c” grade or lower credit that can’t easily qualify for a purchase money loan outside of FHA

3)  Legacy Second Liens – 18 million borrowers.  Legacy seconds that banks refuse to extinguish also trap millions of homeowners making them useless in the macro housing market equation.

 

Bottom Line:

First timers and investors are volatile and thin cohorts that cannot sustain a “durable” recovery or push macro housing to “escape velocity”.   In fact, “distressed resales” have only averaged 110k per month over the past two years.  That is nowhere near enough demand to absorb all the likely supply detailed in the chart below.

The investor and first timer by and large bowed out of the market in June, as the distressed supply was all but chocked off for the election cycle. Now, the Realtors are screaming for more Foreclosures…how ironic.

This housing market will never achieve a “durable recovery” or “escape velocity” with 20 to 30 million homeowners — the prime repeat buyer cohort — trapped in their houses due to effective negative equity, poor credit, or legacy second liens.  All that will continue to happen is stimulus-induced short squeezes like we saw this year and in 2010 followed by hangovers like in 2011 and will again in the back half of 2012 and 2013.

HARP, Refis Cannot Cure Negative Equity. Well Duh!

This article comes from the Mortgage Servicing News.  This is the industry group for mortgage servicers.  Servicers are the ones that collect your mortgage payments and pass the money on to the actual owner of your loan.  Servicers are also the ones that try to modify your loan and will ultimately foreclose on you if you don't pay. 

This group is in trouble and looking for ways to keep us in the dark about the truth of the housing collapse.  They need to keep as many of us paying as they can.  I am posting this article in it's entirety and have highlighted the spots that might interest you.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Forget refinancing. A new hypothesis suggests targeted modifications would be much more effective in easing the negative equity crisis.

Government-backed or not, broad-scale refinancing is a weak stimulus that does not have the power to cure the negative equity pit ailing millions of underwater borrowers, said housing analyst Edward Pinto during his keynote presentation at the National Mortgage News Best Practices in Loss Mitigation Conference in Dallas.

Instead, the American Enterprise Institute resident fellow—known for his harsh views on government intervention in housing—proposes targeted modifications of GSE loans for severely underwater borrowers who are current.

According to Pinto’s calculations, such measures can reduce Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s taxpayer losses by about $10 billion.

So far, “given the underwhelming impact” of the taxpayer-funded stimulus, he said, refinances have become the stimulus of choice even though it is not free because “every dollar going to a borrower is taken from a saver.”

In a nutshell he argues that all refinancing, both the Home Affordable Refinancing Program and refinancing made possible by the low interest rate environment, are not an effective stimulus to improve the economic situation because they are not job-creation vehicles.

“HARP and refinances generally are a weak stimulus because for every dollar saved by a borrower, a dollar is lost by an investor,” Pinto told this publication. “As a result they are not particularly effective in creating additional demand that results in more jobs.”

At the same time the vast majority of HARP loans have a 30-year term, he said. “Therefore they do not address a big problem facing the real estate market—borrowers who are underwater on their loans.” These underwater borrowers “will remain under water for many years.”

“The Federal Reserve continues its efforts to lower interest rates and the administration keeps expanding mortgage refinance programs in an effort to promote more lending,” Pinto said. Pinto estimates that administration efforts to keep rates low have resulted in 14 million residential refis since 2009. Nonetheless the economic recovery “has been the slowest since at least World War II.”

His “modest proposal” targets severely underwater, nondelinquent GSE loans with a combined loan-to-value ratio of 120% or higher.

Such a program, which consists of a constant payment alternative, would apply to loans guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie before they went into conservatorship in September 2008.

The goal would be to retain the same monthly payments these borrowers have been paying for an average of five years and modifying the interest rate on the loan down from an average of 6.1% to today’s low rates of roughly 3.5%. He also suggests loan terms of anywhere from 15 to 17 years.

“This approach is very targeted and much more simple to execute,” he said. It will accomplish “the goal of rapid deleverage as the loan would now pay off in 15 to 18 years, and present little or no moral hazard.”

Pinto sees an advantage to dealing with underwater but current mortgagors because they have shown a consistent behavior to pay and are less likely to default on purpose.

But there is a catch for the GSEs. “Have Fannie and Freddie buy the to-be-modified loans out of the mortgage backed securities’ pools at par,” he said, which will make the intervention fair to the bondholders. His rationale: “These withdrawn loans are in the MBS that benefited from the direct taxpayer bailout of Fannie and Freddie, a bailout that was not legally required.”

He said there is a legal maxim here that reads: “Those that seek equity must do equity.”

Pinto’s equity math follows a basic example. An existing 6% interest rate on a 30-year loan originated in January 2007 with a monthly principal and interest payment of $839 for an original balance of $140,000 and a current balance of $130,000 and a current home value of $100,000 results in a 130% current LTV. (He also assumes there is zero nominal house price change.)

Currently there are two alternatives available.

If nothing is done in five years the LTV would be 117%. If the loan is refinanced through a typical HARP transaction into a 4%, 30-year loan with a $132,000 balance after paying $2,000 in financed fees, the monthly principal and interest payment would be $630 a month and after five years the LTV would be 119%.

Pinto’s constant payment alternative would allow “for borrowers substantially underwater” to modify their loan into a 3.375% interest, 17-year loan with a $130,000 balance and a $838 monthly principal and interest payment that after five years would have an LTV of 99%. Plus, they may only pay near zero fees when they modify their loan.

Another factor that in Pinto’s view needs to be taken into consideration is probability of default.

Quoting findings from “The Case for Accelerated Amortization,” a recent research study by Alan Boyce, Glenn Hubbard, Christopher Mayer and James Witkin, Pinto argued that the efficiency of this approach is evident given the fact that severely underwater GSE loans “have a high probability of default.”

It found GSE loans with LTVs of 125% or higher have an expected default rate of 15.78%.

The study also shows 26% of GSE loans with LTVs higher than 125% that were current as of December 2011, were 30 days or more delinquent as of March 2012—compared to only 11% of loans with LTVs of 100% to 109.99%.

“The taxpayer benefits are substantial,” Pinto concluded.

Using data from the aforementioned study, he quantifies these benefits at roughly $10 billion for average 17-year term modifications and about $11 billion for 15-year modifications.

Confidence in Housing Values Falls to Lows for the Year

I am a big fan of Rasmussen Reports.  While I have had enough of political polls, I believe Rasmusen does a great job of gaging the trends amongst "Working America".  This is a recent poll about the housing market.  Regardless of what the media, the government, NAR and the MBA want us to believe, the housing market is still a long way from the bottom. 

Here is the full Rasmussen article followed by the wording of the questions:  

Confidence in the short- and long-term housing market among homeowners has fallen to the lowest level of 2012.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Homeowners shows that just 18% expect their home’s value to go up over the next year, down four points from June. Twenty-five percent (25%) expect home values to go down over the next year, while 51% say they will remain about the same. 

Looking further ahead, just 38% of homeowners now believe the value of their home will go up over the next five years, representing a 13-point drop from last month and among the lowest findings in three years of surveying. Fifteen percent (15%) expect values to go down during the next five years. Thirty-six percent (36%) predict that they will remain about the same.

Confidence in home values over the short- and long-term is at the lowest point since late 2011. Still, belief that home values will go up over the next year remains slightly above findings for most of last year. The number of homeowners who expect home values to go up over five years first fell below 40% in April of last year.

Half of Americans (50%) report that the value of their home is worth more than the amount they owe on their mortgage, up slightly from 47% last month. This finding slipped below 50% for the first time in June of last year and has ranged from 44% to 57% ever since. Thirty-nine percent (39%) say their home is not worth more than what they owe, down slightly from last month’s high of 42%.

Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls

The national survey of 732 Adult Homeowners was conducted on July 18-19, 2012 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 4 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen

Just six percent (6%) of homeowners report missing or being late on a mortgage payment in the last six months. Thirteen percent (13%) say it’s at least somewhat likely that will happen over the next six months, but only four percent (4%) think it's Very Likely. Both findings have changed little over the past two years.

Men and women share similar views about home values over the next year, but men express more confidence about values five years from now.

Investors are slightly more optimistic about the housing market compared to non-investors. 

Married homeowners are twice as confident as non-married homeowners when it comes to home values in the short- and long-term.

Republican homeowners show more pessimism than Democrats and those not affiliated with either political party about home values over the next year. There is less partisan disagreement when it comes to the housing market in five years.

Separate polling shows that nearly half (44%) of young Americans now say they owe more money than they did last year. Overall, 30% of all Americans say they owe more than they did a year ago.

 

 

National Survey of 732 Adult Homeowners
Conducted July 18-19, 2012

By Rasmussen Reports

 

1* Looking ahead over the next year, is the value of your home likely to go up, go down, or remain about the same?

2* What about over the next five years? Is the value of your home likely to go up, go down, or remain about the same? 

3* Is the value of your home worth more than the amount you owe on your mortgage? 

 

4* Over the last six months, have you missed or been late on a mortgage payment? 

5* Looking ahead, how likely are you to miss or be late with a mortgage payment in the next six months? 

 

You have options for your underwater house, you won't find them through traditional sources.  Find all of your options at www.myownbailout.com