June 18, 2013

Finally! The Extension to the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act

mortgage debt relief act extensionMany of the members of the Financial Revival Group have been waiting for this extension to happen and know what it is about.  As we have been discussing in our Member Emails and in our Monthly Members Only Meetings, we fully expected this extension to take place.  We even expressed to you that we thought it would simply be an add-on to the fiscal cliff bill, which indeed it was.

It is official.  The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act has been extended through the end of 2013. 

We still have more to do because we think this bill should have been extended for three years, not just one.  However, with all of the lobbying that went on from many different groups, we don’t believe that further extensions of this bill will be an issue. 

Now, for the benefit of our readers who are not members of the Financial Revival Group and don’t know what this act is about, here is a quick explanation.

If you owe a debt and that debt is forgiven, you have received a financial benefit from that transaction.  When the creditor finally gives up or settles the debt for less than is owed and stops further action to collect the debt, they have officially taken a loss.  The IRS says that since you actually received the money and didn’t fully pay it back, you received a “gift” from that creditor and that “gift” amount is taxable as normal income. 

In the past, we saw this mostly with credit card companies and other uncollectable debts.  If you settled a $20,000 credit card debt for $8,000 you and the IRS would receive a form 1099 for $12,000.  (The IRS gets a copy to make sure you include with your next tax return)  You would have to pay income tax on that $12,000.  If you were in a 15% tax bracket, your tax bill the following year would increase by $1,800.  Not a bad trade by most standards. 

With the continuing housing collapse, we are seeing this same event in real estate but with much larger numbers.  So to help out underwater homeowners, the Bush Administration passed the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act in 2007 that says that if your bank suffers a loss on your house, in certain cases, you would be exempt from the tax.  This law expired at the end of 2010 but was extended through the end of 2012 by the Obama Administration.  Now the bill has been extended again through the end of 2013.

This law applies to you if:

  1. Your bank takes a loss on your house as a result of a foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, short sale, loan modification or principle reduction.
  2. The event is completed by the end of 2013.  That means your foreclosure, short sale etc. has to be finalized by the end of the year. 
  3. The property is your primary residence.
  4. The money forgiven was used to buy, build or substantially improve the property.
  5. The forgiven amount is less than $2 Million.  Hey, movie stars and basketball players need a break too.

 So, if you have been waiting for the extension of this bill to make a move on your underwater house, now is the time.  Nothing is quick in this process, no matter which way you decide to go.  The first thing you need to do is to find out what all of your options look like and how they will affect you moving forward. 

If you or someone you know wants to find out about every option you have available, you can start with a free 15 minute consultation with the Financial Revival Group.  This free, no obligation phone call will help you get your immediate questions answered and put you on the right track based on your particular situation.  Call us at 425-259-2600 to schedule your consultation or CLICK HERE to email us. 

THEY are talking up the housing market. Do you really believe them? Don’t!

I am so frustrated by all of the talking up of the housing market.  More people are going to be hurt financially by this intentional deceit by the infamous "They" we have talked about in previous posts.  We got here because we have been lied to throughout this whole housing collape.  There is a lot more pain to come in housing.  Just because you have held out this long does not mean you are going to make it through what it still awaits us no matter what "They" say. 

The piece below is a full reprint of a post by Martin Andelman of Mandelman Matters.  Martin and I have had many discussions about this topic and he puts it very well so I wanted you to see this. 

 

Talking Up the Housing Market? Yada, Yada, Yada… Talk is Cheap

By Martin Andelman

Now I get it… our plan is to try to TALK the housing market up.

Apparently, and I just realized this today, some people think they have figured out that if we just keep talking about how the housing market is recovering… it will respond by recovering.  It’s positively brilliant.  Someone should really let the EU countries know about this strategy because they could really use it, since absolutely nothing else is working in the least.

Hey, you guys in Spain… instead of all that rioting, try saying this over and over again in the newspapers and on television: “El mercado de la vivienda se está recuperando… El mercado de la vivienda se está recuperando!”  That should pretty much handle it.  See, problem solved… glad I could help.

And you guys in Greece, try saying whatever this sounds like: “Η αγορά κατοικίας είναι ανάκτηση.”  And your welcome, by the way.

Okay, look… talk is cheap.  And the strategy of talking about how the housing market is recovering in order to actually make anything recover, although hysterical, is just plain stupid.

On the other hand, since it’s obvious that essentially no one, present company excluded, has the foggiest idea of what to do differently, or is willing to even try doing anything differently, then I suppose talk is all we’ve got.  So, go ahead chatty Cathys… blather on.  Besides, I’ve gotten much better at ignoring you.

 

 

The Scale of the Crisis at the End of 2012

As of the end of this year, we will have lost FIVE MILLION homes to foreclosure… and 10 MILLION MORE American households have faced the prospect of foreclosure since the crisis began during the third quarter of 2006.  Add to those the numbers the 5.3 MILLION NOW in the foreclosure pipeline, meaning they have already received a foreclosure notice or are over 30 days delinquent… and 3.3 MILLION of them are over 90 days delinquent or already in pre-sale inventory.

Then stop to consider that there are only 50 million homes carrying a mortgage in this country… and then do the math.  You shouldn’t need a calculator to know that the answer to any equation comes out CRISIS of historical proportion no matter what the talkers are talking about today.

In addition, it’s interesting that no one wants to talk about the COMPLETED BANK REPOSSESSIONS continuing at the rate of about 50,000 A MONTH, with foreclosure starts at 100,000 A MONTH.

But, the housing market is recovering, the housing market is recovering… well yada, yada, yada and a blah, blah, blah.

 

 

First Time Buyer Demand Falling

One of the only legitimate sources of demand for homes in this country would be that provided by first time buyers.  Think about it… they can’t be underwater because they don’t already own a home.  So, with at least a third of the country’s homeowners underwater and unable to move, our first time buyers are about the only growing demographic we’ve got, since we’re certainly not growing investors in any sort of hurry.

The latest edition of Fannie Mae’s Housing Insights, however, in which Fannie economists examined the data shows that the decline in the homeownership rate over the last four years has been particularly pronounced for young households.

According to Mortgage News Daily on November 15, 2012, “five years after the start of the housing bust American households continue to shift from homeownership to being renters.”  And why this would be any sort of surprise to anyone is beyond me.

The particularly bad news is that homeownership among the younger demographic groups dropped the most in each of the last five years.  In fact, overall homeownership among those between age 25-44 has declined at double the rate of the overall decline.

The only age group that did not seen a decline in homeownership in 2010 and 2011 is the age 75+ group.

But don’t worry, I’m certainly confident that this country’s OCTOGENARIANS (people in their 80s, just to make sure everyone’s with me) are going to save our housing market… so attention all talkers, better get ready to start talking about that.

Why are young people not buying homes like they used to?  Well, gee… let’s see if we can’t figure that out without having to look anything up, shall we?

Well, there’s the issue of student loan debt, which has become such a scam that I may have to devote an entire blog to it in the near future.  And then there’s the need for 20 percent down payments and 760 credit scores… unless we’re talking FHA loans, in which case we’re talking about 20 percent defaults and increasing insurance premiums and tightening underwriting requirements.

Oh, something else… there’s the relatively higher unemployment numbers among the younger demographics, twice as high as the average in many areas.  And then there’s the fact that young people AREN’T STUPID, so one might imagine that since AT LEAST 20 MILLION of them have watched their elders either lose homes or be at risk of losing homes, it might just be that many are in no hurry to repeat the apparent mistakes of the past.

Ya’ think?  Or do the MORONS reading this think we need to conduct a study to figure that out too?

 

 

Being Underwater

Consider the chart from Zillow below to get an idea of how the underwater problem can do nothing but significantly reduce future demand.  Zoom in on it to read it closely, but if you don’t have your glasses, the blue bars are underwater homes by city, and the red bars are delinquent underwater homes by city.

And that’s what Zillow thinks.  Just imagine what the truth of the situation is, because you know it’s not better than Zillow’s.  Just by factoring in the percentage underwater when including real estate sales commissions would take all of those numbers up by 6 percent, right?  Yes, right.

 

Foreclosures to Come

Another factor that makes talkers mute and much of their data moot is how state laws have created markets where foreclosures are delayed and hanging like the Sword of Damocles over their respective markets.

In case you’re a little rusty on your legends from classical Greek culture, Roman philosopher Cicero uses this story to reach the conclusion that virtue is all you need to live a happy life, when he asks the question, “Does not Dionysius seem to have made it sufficiently clear that there can be nothing happy for the person over whom some fear always looms?

Look at the chart below to see how Nevada’s new law, AB 284, which took effect in October of 2011, has impacted servicers filing Notices of Default.  It’s not a chart showing problems being solved, it’s just a study in kicking the proverbial can down the road.

 

 

As Phillip Gusterson, writing for Seeking Alpha on November 27th, said in his article titled, “Dark Forces Manipulate the Housing Market, “AB284 has dramatically reduced foreclosures in Las Vegas. The result is a lesson in basic economics, with a drop in supply leading to an increase in prices. But what is clear to everyone is that the supply is artificially constrained, and a second lesson in economics could be around the corner: an increase in supply will lead to lower prices.”

He goes on to point out what should be obvious, “AB284 did not remove the need to foreclose on these properties, it just removed the ability to do it, so now one year later we have at least 24,000 units that should have been filed on, but were not because lawmakers in a run up to a general election decided to manipulate the market.”

I don’t agree with everything Mr. Gusterson has to say, but on that point there’s absolutely no chance that he’s even a little bit wrong.  When supply goes down, prices always go up… and the reverse is also true… welcome to Econ 101.

And if that fundamental truth wasn’t enough to cause those thinking that Las Vegas is already at the bottom of the market to pause, Gusterson also points out that, “Las Vegas also has a disproportionate share of ARM mortgages. When interest rates inevitably rise that this will cause a further wave of defaults just as the market shows signs of genuine recovery stimulated by economic growth.”

Notices of Default are increasing steadily over the last few months, however,  which just shows that the banks will ultimately figure out how to foreclose within the current legislative requirements.  As Gusterson’s article opines, “… it does seem logical that the significant market force of 75,000 delinquents will eventually overcome the barriers that politicians throw up to stem the tide.”

He figures that banks will use some combination of “improved administration, short sales, bulk note sales, bulk REO sales, and judicial foreclosures to operate within the post-AB284 environment to work through the foreclosures, and that the post-MERS environment will encourage them to increase the rate of foreclosure.”  

Once again, he is most assuredly correct, but he may be missing one additional factor, which is that the legislature, all too aware of AB 284’s draconian and utterly paralyzing effect on the market, may very well act to weaken the law in order to make it somewhat easier to foreclose in the future.

Lastly, consider that in 2102, according to the Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors, almost 55 percent of all homes sold in Southern Nevada were bought as ALL CASH deals.  And you don’t have to be any sort of economic expert to realize that we just don’t have anywhere near enough people able to pay cash for homes to create any sort of actual recovery.  (I’m not going to bother sourcing that statement, if you don’t instinctively know it to be the case, you’re an idiot and reading the wrong blog, so scat. I have no time for you.)

 

 

What Is Going Up?

The only segment of any housing market going up is at the bottom of the market, where investors are prone to bid against each other, afraid that they’ll lose out.  It’s the same sort of greedy mentality that takes hold at auctions, where I’ve seen people pay more for things than they would have to if buy them at their retail price.

The simple fact is that the markets aren’t acting rationally, and I’m sure part of it is that some of the talking causes irrational things to happen.  For example, Dr. Housing Bubble, who follows Southern California’s housing market better than anyone, points out that while “home sales are up by 8 percent year-over-year, during the same period, the median home price fell by 3.7 percent.”

That’s just great… as demand goes up, price falls?  Try answering questions on an economics exam that way and you’ll fail the test sure as shootin’.  Again, according to Dr. Housing Bubble

“If you want to see delusion in action take a look at Zillow’s “make me move” option and you will see it in full force.  Even with mortgage rates at record low prices and very generous products like FHA loans that only require 3.5 percent down, the market seems to be moving lower in mid-tier to upper-tier areas.”

Well, obviously that part of the market needs a stern talking to, wouldn’t you say?  Get to work talkers… I expect to see some yabbering and in a hurry.

 

 

Talk is Cheap

The fact that there are properties at the very bottom that appear to have increased in price by a few points is no indication that housing is recovering.

Remember, the underwater problem is just as it was, so demand can’t increase because half the market can’t move.  And remember that, for the most part, no one is selling their home unless they have to, so the supply is reduced because no one wants to compete with foreclosures and short sales when selling their home into what is already the worst housing market in 70 years.

If people were selling, without demand increasing, then prices would fall even further as the impact of increased supply and competition could produce no other outcome. And there’s just nowhere that demand can come from as long as we’re pretending that our economy and housing market are recovering, and therefore doing NOTHING about ANYTHING.

Our situation related to unemployment in this country is nothing short of horrific… we’ve got at least 5.5 MILLION people out of work for over six months.  In California, the published rate is over 11 percent, and that’s not even a fully loaded number.  And we haven’t created anything but part-time and minimum wage jobs over the last four years, so even if working, EVERYONE is making less.

What’s amazing to me is that we’re not even pressuring our elected officials to do anything.  Other than a few Occupy people camping on lawns until they get arrested, the only thing we’re doing is kvetching on Facebook and pacing through sleepless nights.

Here’s an excerpt from a Rolling Stone article from last June, written by Jeff Tietz…

To aid Santa Barbara’s large homeless population, local activists launched the Safe Parking program and since the Great Recession began, the number of lots and participants in the program has doubled. By 2009, formerly middle-class people like Janis Adkins had begun turning up – teachers and computer repairmen and yoga instructors seeking refuge in the city’s parking­ lots. 

Safe-parking programs in other cities have experienced a similar influx of middle-class exiles, and their numbers are not expected to decrease anytime soon. 

It can take years for unemployed workers from the middle class to burn through their resources – savings, credit, salable belongings, home equity, loans from family and friends. 

Some 5.4 million Americans have been without work for at least six months, and an estimated 750,000 of them are completely broke or heading inexorably toward destitution. In California, where unemployment remains at 11 percent, middle-class refugees like Janis Adkins are only the earliest arrivals. “She’s the tip of the iceberg,” says Nancy Kapp, the coordinator of the Safe Parking program. 

“There are many people out there who haven’t hit bottom yet, but they’re on their way – they’re on their way.”

 

Afraid?  Terrified?  Yeah, well me too. 

It’s happening all around us, most of us see the signs of the cracks widening every day.  But too many of us are still in denial, they don’t want to talk about it, they’d rather just listen to the happy talk crowd who are constantly trying to talk our economy back to health.

My wife noticed that I didn’t bother to vote this year and asked me why.  I replied that for all our president is doing, I would have been okay with leaving the position open for the next four years… you know, just not fill it until someone worth voting for comes along.  But it now occurs to me that President Obama fits in  perfectly with what’s going on.  If talking the economy up will somehow work, then I’ve changed my mind and he’s the perfect guy for that job.  (Hahaha… get it?)

Here’s the real deal, however… while you might be able to get ME up by talking to me, housing isn’t going anywhere but sideways and down no matter what anyone says.  Bet on it.

Mandelman out. 

Attorneys general request extended tax relief for distressed homeowners

Did you know that if you do a short sale, foreclosure or settle a 2nd mortgage you can get out of the debt on your underwater home that you could still owe the IRS a lot of money?

While many states allow homeowners to get out of their houses without the threat of the bank coming after them for the money the bank lost, the IRS can still haunt you for lots of money in taxes.  Whatever money the bank loses on your underwater house is looked upon by the IRS as a gift from the bank and requires you to pay income tax on it. 

Currently there is a law in place that exempts most homeowners from this tax.  However, this law exprires on December 31, 2012.  The Mortgage Foregiveness Debt Relief Act began with the Bush administration and extended in the Obama administration via the Dodd-Frank bill.  This makes it bi-partisan but needs to be extended.  We have brought this to your attention in previous posts and to support the extension of this important bill. We are gettting some additional help.

Below is an article published by Housing Wire.  Written by Megan Hopkins. 

Four attorneys general are leading the fight to extend tax relief to homeowners who faced financial hardship such as a foreclosure and were granted mortgage debt forgiveness.

Attorneys General Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, Lisa Madigan of Illinois, Pam Bondi of Florida, George Jepsen of Connecticut and Martha Coakley of Massachusetts lead the national effort of 41 state attorneys general calling on Congress to extend the exclusion, in place since 2007. Various government agencies and industry trade groups began fighting for an extension as early as April.

If Congress does not answer, the tax relief efforts put in place by the Mortgage Debt Relief Act will expire on Dec. 31. This federal act essentially dismisses a distressed homeowner’s mortgage debt in the case of a foreclosure, short sale or loan modification.

With the recent push toward more principal reductions via the national settlement between state AGs and the nation's biggest mortgage servicers, hundreds of thousands could be impacted. The $20 bilion-plus settlement outlines consumer-relief mandates and servicing requirements for the nation's largest mortgage servicers.

“Failure to extend this tax relief would hurt the very families we set out to help in the national foreclosure settlement,” Illinois' Madigan said. “We need to do everything we can to encourage — not deter — struggling homeowners to seek help to stay in their homes.”

The AGs wrote a letter to the leaders of the U.S. House and Senate requesting an extension. The letter noted that if the $25 billion national settlement does expire, homeowners would face up to $1.3 billion in tax increases over two years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

"Unless Congress acts, any debt relief to be provided in 2013 under the national mortgage settlement, as well as other mortgage debt relief programs, will likely be considered taxable income," said Masto.

Added Coakley, “This tax relief is critical for helping struggling homeowners stay in their homes as we work to repair the damage from the foreclosure crisis. We urge Congress to ensure families are not hit with an unexpected tax bill when seeking a loan modification.”

More than 4,000 homeowners had received mortgage debt relief for an average savings of $67,457 per homeowner in Coakley's state of Massachusetts since the settlement was signed earlier this year.

An extension is included in the Family and Business Tax Cut Certainty Act of 2012 (S. 3521), which recently passed out of the Senate Finance Committee with bipartisan support.

HARP, Refis Cannot Cure Negative Equity. Well Duh!

This article comes from the Mortgage Servicing News.  This is the industry group for mortgage servicers.  Servicers are the ones that collect your mortgage payments and pass the money on to the actual owner of your loan.  Servicers are also the ones that try to modify your loan and will ultimately foreclose on you if you don't pay. 

This group is in trouble and looking for ways to keep us in the dark about the truth of the housing collapse.  They need to keep as many of us paying as they can.  I am posting this article in it's entirety and have highlighted the spots that might interest you.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Forget refinancing. A new hypothesis suggests targeted modifications would be much more effective in easing the negative equity crisis.

Government-backed or not, broad-scale refinancing is a weak stimulus that does not have the power to cure the negative equity pit ailing millions of underwater borrowers, said housing analyst Edward Pinto during his keynote presentation at the National Mortgage News Best Practices in Loss Mitigation Conference in Dallas.

Instead, the American Enterprise Institute resident fellow—known for his harsh views on government intervention in housing—proposes targeted modifications of GSE loans for severely underwater borrowers who are current.

According to Pinto’s calculations, such measures can reduce Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s taxpayer losses by about $10 billion.

So far, “given the underwhelming impact” of the taxpayer-funded stimulus, he said, refinances have become the stimulus of choice even though it is not free because “every dollar going to a borrower is taken from a saver.”

In a nutshell he argues that all refinancing, both the Home Affordable Refinancing Program and refinancing made possible by the low interest rate environment, are not an effective stimulus to improve the economic situation because they are not job-creation vehicles.

“HARP and refinances generally are a weak stimulus because for every dollar saved by a borrower, a dollar is lost by an investor,” Pinto told this publication. “As a result they are not particularly effective in creating additional demand that results in more jobs.”

At the same time the vast majority of HARP loans have a 30-year term, he said. “Therefore they do not address a big problem facing the real estate market—borrowers who are underwater on their loans.” These underwater borrowers “will remain under water for many years.”

“The Federal Reserve continues its efforts to lower interest rates and the administration keeps expanding mortgage refinance programs in an effort to promote more lending,” Pinto said. Pinto estimates that administration efforts to keep rates low have resulted in 14 million residential refis since 2009. Nonetheless the economic recovery “has been the slowest since at least World War II.”

His “modest proposal” targets severely underwater, nondelinquent GSE loans with a combined loan-to-value ratio of 120% or higher.

Such a program, which consists of a constant payment alternative, would apply to loans guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie before they went into conservatorship in September 2008.

The goal would be to retain the same monthly payments these borrowers have been paying for an average of five years and modifying the interest rate on the loan down from an average of 6.1% to today’s low rates of roughly 3.5%. He also suggests loan terms of anywhere from 15 to 17 years.

“This approach is very targeted and much more simple to execute,” he said. It will accomplish “the goal of rapid deleverage as the loan would now pay off in 15 to 18 years, and present little or no moral hazard.”

Pinto sees an advantage to dealing with underwater but current mortgagors because they have shown a consistent behavior to pay and are less likely to default on purpose.

But there is a catch for the GSEs. “Have Fannie and Freddie buy the to-be-modified loans out of the mortgage backed securities’ pools at par,” he said, which will make the intervention fair to the bondholders. His rationale: “These withdrawn loans are in the MBS that benefited from the direct taxpayer bailout of Fannie and Freddie, a bailout that was not legally required.”

He said there is a legal maxim here that reads: “Those that seek equity must do equity.”

Pinto’s equity math follows a basic example. An existing 6% interest rate on a 30-year loan originated in January 2007 with a monthly principal and interest payment of $839 for an original balance of $140,000 and a current balance of $130,000 and a current home value of $100,000 results in a 130% current LTV. (He also assumes there is zero nominal house price change.)

Currently there are two alternatives available.

If nothing is done in five years the LTV would be 117%. If the loan is refinanced through a typical HARP transaction into a 4%, 30-year loan with a $132,000 balance after paying $2,000 in financed fees, the monthly principal and interest payment would be $630 a month and after five years the LTV would be 119%.

Pinto’s constant payment alternative would allow “for borrowers substantially underwater” to modify their loan into a 3.375% interest, 17-year loan with a $130,000 balance and a $838 monthly principal and interest payment that after five years would have an LTV of 99%. Plus, they may only pay near zero fees when they modify their loan.

Another factor that in Pinto’s view needs to be taken into consideration is probability of default.

Quoting findings from “The Case for Accelerated Amortization,” a recent research study by Alan Boyce, Glenn Hubbard, Christopher Mayer and James Witkin, Pinto argued that the efficiency of this approach is evident given the fact that severely underwater GSE loans “have a high probability of default.”

It found GSE loans with LTVs of 125% or higher have an expected default rate of 15.78%.

The study also shows 26% of GSE loans with LTVs higher than 125% that were current as of December 2011, were 30 days or more delinquent as of March 2012—compared to only 11% of loans with LTVs of 100% to 109.99%.

“The taxpayer benefits are substantial,” Pinto concluded.

Using data from the aforementioned study, he quantifies these benefits at roughly $10 billion for average 17-year term modifications and about $11 billion for 15-year modifications.

A brilliant reply to a politician begging for money!

Another post from Martin Andelman of Mandelman Matters…

Nancy Pelosi sent my reader Amy an email. And Amy replied brilliantly.

 
 

On Jun 9, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Nancy Pelosi wrote:

Amy –

Today is my 25th anniversary in Congress.

I want to take a moment to thank you for your support over the years.

We have made tremendous progress because you have stood with me to ensure that we continue moving America forward.

And now, it’s because of friends and supporters like you that the House Majority is within reach with five months left until Election Day.



On this special anniversary, House Democrats are focused on the 25 seats we need to win the Majority.

Please contribute $3 or more right now to ensure House Democrats have important resources to support strong Democratic candidates and Members facing tough challenges for re-election and hold Republicans accountable for their misguided agenda.

President Obama needs a strong Democratic Majority in Congress and your support will bring us closer to returning the gavel to Democrats who will focus on the people’s interests instead of the special interests.

You are the backbone of our party and we will win in November because of your tireless support and determination.

  Can you chip in today?

Onward to victory,

Nancy

 

###

 

 

So, on Jun 9, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Amy Sheaffer wrote back:

Dear Ms. Pelosi,

Today is my 13th anniversary in my home.  

I have seen no progress in “America moving forward”.  I have lived with the stress of pending foreclosure, postponed home auction dates, underemployment and bankruptcy for the past several years.  

Please take the time to contribute a small portion of your huge salary to:  The Fund to Save Amy’s Home!!

Your donation is greatly appreciated and will contribute to continued shelter for myself and my cat, Mr. Miles!  

Remember that a portion of your donation (or all of it) is tax deductible!

Sincerely,

Amy Sheaffer, MA, LMFT

We are less than 1/2 way through foreclosures

This is a video done by Frank and Brian of the TBWS Daily.  These two market to the Real Estate and Mortgage business.  They sell products and services to help people in the industry to be more successful.  Frank and Brian have been making these daily videos for years and I follow them because they have their fingers on the pulse of the real estate market. 

Their overall belief is that we need to get through the housing collapse and the foreclosures that come with it so their clients (Real Estate Agents and Mortgage people) can get back to making money.  They often talk about the good news that will keep the industry going.  For them to publicly state that we have a long way to go in the number of home foreclosures is unusual.  That is why we wanted to post it. 

At the Financial Revival Group, we don't beleive we are close to the halfway point in the total number of foreclosures we will exprience in our country.  However, it is important that we all have a clear picture of what is ahead for all of us so we can make our own decisions about what to do with our underwater properties.  That picture has been clouded by the banks, the media and the government.  We still have a long way to go and you should know that, as you evaluate what you are going to do for your own survival.

Bernanke Says U.S. Job Market Weak Despite Gains

Here is my two cents on an article published in AOLJobs.com containing more hype about how the economy is getting better.   

FED Chairman Ben Bernanke says the economy is still weak despite three months of increased hiring.  You see, they continue to manipulate the numbers to make things look better than they really are.  Of course the economy is still weak.  It is almost dead.  "They" keep trying to tell us that we are in a recovery and they "adjust" the numbers so that they can use the term recovery when they talk about the economy.  

"Bernanke said the combination of modest economic growth and rapid declines in unemployment is something of a puzzle. Normally, it takes growth of roughly 4 percent annual growth to lower the rate by that much over a year."

There is no puzzle.  Unemployment did not drop to 8.3% as the Obama administrations Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) said recently when it released its seasonally adjusted rate.  Gallup has the unemployment rate at 9.1% and they go on to say that the underemployment rate is at 19.1%.  That feels more accurate, doesn't it?

Are you feeling the "recovery" yet?  

If you are unemployed or underemployed, do you have any good prospects to get a job that pays you what you used to make?  Most people would answer that with a resounding no. 

If you own a house, chances are you are underwater.  If you are not underwater, you are closer than you were a year ago.  If you don't believe me, check it out for yourself. 

If this were a real recovery, would your monthly budget be as tight as it is right now?  No way. 

We are not in a recovery, we are in a recession/depression.  That may not be what the politicians are calling it but that is the way it feels for most people.  What did you pay for gas the last time you bought some?   How much has your grocery bill gone up over the past year? 

Recovery?  It's about time they all started telling the truth.  They won't though because they know that if they keep repeating the same lie over and over again, the sheeple will believe it and act accordingly only to destroy themselves financially. 

Don't let them destroy you too.  Pay attention or perish.  You are on your own…

By the way, CLICK HERE to read the full article.   If you look for the story behind the story, you are sure to find it. 

Mortgage Settlement Deal Confronts Legacy of Obama Foreclosure Failure

We are reprinting this article by Peter S. Goodman in it's entirety.  It is from the left leaning Huffington Post.  It talks about the new settlement the AG's made with the big 5 banks.  Of course we know that the AG's got out negotiated…again!  Here is Mr. Goodman's well writtent take on it. 

 

After years of incompetence, intransigence, malevolence and whatever else may explain how mortgage companies have managed to screw over millions of troubled American homeowners, a fix is finally at hand.

This is how the Obama administration invites us to view the broad, $25 billion state and federal foreclosure settlement that it struck last month with the nation's five largest mortgage companies.

Officials have presented the deal as justice for the so-called robo-signing scandal, whereby major mortgage companies improperly foreclosed on millions of properties. They have touted its centerpiece: a $20 billion fund stocked with fines paid by the mortgage companies, which will deliver relief to as many as 1 million troubled borrowers via lowered monthly payments, principal reduction and refinanced loan terms.

The president portrayed the deal as no less than a curative, calling it a "landmark settlement" that will "speed relief to the hardest hit homeowners" and "begin to turn the page on an era of recklessness that has left so much damage in its wake."

Yet anyone who has paid even minor attention to the administration's housing policy may be permitted to ask: For real? We have heard this sort of talk many times before from the Obama administration, only to see more homes slide into the foreclosure crisis. What's special this time?

A good deal, asserts Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan, who played a leading role in brokering the deal.

In a pair of recent conversations, his message essentially boiled down to this: Thus far much of what has happened on the housing relief front has been torturously frustrating, pinning millions of distressed borrowers in Hell's own filing cabinet. But this deal reflects crucial lessons learned, yielding a new program that will work better.

The keys to the deal, Donovan maintains, are new standards that mortgage companies must live by and an independent monitor empowered to watch over implementation, with possible fines reaching $1 million per violation. The deal will be filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., ensuring a venue for legal enforcement.

"The most important thing is that you require outcomes," Donovan said during a meeting this week with Huffington Post editors and reporters. "At the end of the day, the leverage is different."

He drew a distinction between this settlement and a previous deal struck with the notorious subprime lender Countrywide, now part of (notorious) Bank of America, whose very name can induce spontaneous shrieks of agony in many U.S. homes, along with file folders jammed with inscrutable documents. In that deal, Bank of America was able to satisfy its obligations, simply by reaching out to delinquent borrowers with offers for help.

"This is not 'You have to solicit X number of borrowers,'" Donovan said. "This is 'You have to deliver a result.'"

Donovan noted that the new settlement relies on reductions to principal balances, addressing the fact that roughly 1 in 5 homeowners with a mortgage now owe the bank more than their home is worth. Though he acknowledged that only about 10 percent of mortgages will be eligible for this treatment, he expressed hopes that this would spur other lenders to follow suit.

The HUD secretary is the right person to be talking up the settlement. Earnest and passionate, he comes off like he is generally interested in keeping homeowners in their homes, unlike Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, who manages to convey an abiding interest in keeping bank executives in their corner offices.

Still, the legacy of failure from the Obama administration on the foreclosure front is so great that a proper assessment of the settlement must go beyond its terms. It will come down to the administration's resolve in following through. On that score, legitimate reasons abound for someone to harbor doubts that this deal will amount to anything meaningful for homeowners.

Three years ago, the president stood in Mesa, Ariz., a community ravaged by foreclosure and announced the creation of a new program that he said would spare 3 million to 4 million homeowners from that fate by lowering their mortgage payments. As of last month, fewer than 1 million homeowners had received permanent loan relief under the program, according to a recent scorecard.

From the beginning, millions of applicants who requested help have confronted chaos, disorganization and conflicting instructions. Mortgage companies have repeatedly lost documents and demanded new sets, only to mislay the replacements, too. Borrowers seeking customer service have been switched from office to office (as if it were some corporate version of speed-dating) while enduring maddeningly long hold times. They have received letters on one day congratulating them for gaining approval for lower payments, and the next day informing them of the pending disposition of their home at a sheriff's sale.

Treasury officials like to explain all this misery and confusion by noting that the banks were never built to handle loan modifications, or paperwork in general, which is perversely true. Back when they were handing out loans to anyone with a name, banks did not slow themselves down over concerns about niggling things like income verification. How can they be expected to suddenly become masters of the filing cabinet?

Yet this is no excuse for mortgage companies' horrific mistreatment of borrowers. Had the banks been enjoying, say, a lucrative boom in refinancing, they would surely have managed to hire enough people to answer the telephones and keep track of the requisite files.

They didn't do this for the simple reason that they didn't want to. Instead, they adopted a mode of strategic incompetence: They stocked themselves with the minimum number of people required to claim credit for participating in the program, while guaranteeing that not enough qualified people would be on hand to process the paperwork.

Why didn't the banks want to go along? Because they could generally make a lot more money by dragging out delinquency and eventually foreclosing than they could by keeping borrowers in their homes via manageable payments.

The mortgage companies are mere servicers, in industry parlance. They don't own most of the mortgages. They just send out the bills and collect the payments, while drawing fees from investors who do own the notes. When borrowers stop making payments, servicers put them into special insurance policies with hefty premiums, typically funneling this business through their own subsidiaries. They order up fresh appraisals, sending these orders through their subsidiaries as well. This foreclosure gravy train swiftly outperforms the meager financial incentives that the administration pays servicers when they agree to lower monthly payments.

One element has been consistent throughout this ordeal: the Obama administration's repeated failure to pressure mortgage companies to do what they were supposed to do.

When the program was first being crafted in early 2009, provoking complaints that it appeared toothless, a senior Treasury official who would speak to me only without being named, swore otherwise. He insisted that the agency had plenty of tools to force mortgage companies to deliver on their obligations. Once a servicer signed up for the program, this constituted a legal contract, with sanctions applicable, he said.

As the months passed and horror stories mounted, the Treasury Department repeatedly chastised mortgage companies for their poor performance and vowed consequences.

"The banks are not doing a good enough job," Michael S. Barr, then the Treasury Department's assistant secretary for financial institutions, told me in November 2009, amid the latest batch of lousy program data. "Some of the firms ought to be embarrassed, and they will be."

But as more months passed without improvement, the department's threats proved hollow and then officials began to describe the program in different terms: It was merely voluntary. Congress had not given the administration authority to do anything meaningful.

As the president's speech in Mesa, Ariz., receded into history, it began to seem more and more like a photo opportunity, with the program that he launched nothing more than an effort to buy a little time and public favor while we waited for the only real fix to the foreclosure disaster — an improving economy.

The administration has said that its initial relief program was tailored to help borrowers saddled with mortgages whose interest rates have been reset higher, but not to address the defining problem of our time — joblessness. Yet even a newer program, crafted precisely to help people who can't make their mortgage payments as a result of job loss, is foundering. Less than $218 million had been distributed from the $7.6 billion program as of the beginning of the year, according to a report in the Los Angeles Times.

So, here we are, three years after Obama's bold promise, still talking about the need for new plans. Maybe the terms of the settlement will prove beneficial. Maybe the enforcement will prove robust. We certainly need it.

But until the mortgage companies show genuine willingness to meet their obligations instead of gaming the system and until the Obama administration demonstrates resolve in forcing compliance, this settlement is best viewed as being like its predecessors — an as-yet undelivered promise, with the bill long past due.

A TV News Interview with One of our Members

THE TV STATION PUT THE WRONG WRITTEN STORY WITH THE VIDEO INTERVIEWING ONE OF OUR MEMBERS AND ME. CLICK THE VIDEO TO SEE THE INTERVIEW WITH RAND WHITNEY WHO IS GIVING HIS HOUSE BACK TO THE BANK.

The video is short and does not completely reflect the viewpoints we wanted to make in the interview.  For a short piece, they got pretty close.  King 5 does a good job and trying to tell this whole story and let people know what they can do in such a short time is almost impossible.

 

The incorrect story attached to this video is actually interesting. What the president is now proposing is that FHA will refinance a  couple million of the 16 million underwater homes in America. This would have been a much better idea three or four years ago. Now it is too little, too late.

He is not going to get congress to go along with this idea because he is planning to put the American Taxpayer on the hook for even more mortgages that will ultimately go into default and foreclosure which just adds more to the federal debt and increases the balance sheets of the major banks.

What he really wants is for you to pay about 5% interest (3.9% interest plus 1.1% FHA mortgage insurance) on a 20 year loan. Your payments won't go down much and you will be paying the principle on the loan down faster. In effect, you will be paying your own underwater amount back to the banks and investors, but you will be doing it faster.  With this plan you might be able to sell your underwater home for what you owe in 8 years instead of 10 or 12. 

Again, they are trying to get more money to the banks, all with a guarantee from the taxpayers this time using the Federal Housing Administration.

If you believe it is only the Republicans that are protecting the banks, THINK AGAIN!

11% of Homeowers polled don’t even know if they are upside down in their homes.

I am really interested in what people think about any topic.  I read the letters to the editor in my local paper everyday.  I look at the comments in blogs and online articles.  The mood of the public has the ability to move things in a new direction.  Unfortunately the puppet masters in our society are very good at pushing the public in the direction they want us to go and they have no problem with lying anytime it suits their purpose.

I subscribe to Rasmussen Reports.  If you are not familiar with Rasmussen, they are a polling company.  They take polls on a wide variety of topics but most of their polls are on the economy and politics.  Here is what one of their recent polls says about the housing market. 

Looking ahead over the next year, is the value of your home likely to go up, go down, or

21% Believe their homes will be worth more a year from now.

27% Believe their home will be worth less

51% Believe it will be about the same

What about over the next five years? Is the value of your home likely to go up, go down, or remain about the same?

45% Believe their homes will be worth more five years from now now.

17% Believe their home will be worth less

31% Believe it will be about the same

Is the value of your home worth more than the amount you owe on your mortgage?

56% Believe their house is worth more than they owe

33% Believe they are upside down

11% Don't know

Are you kidding me!  11% of the homeowners polled earlier this month don't even know if they are upside down in their homes or not.  These are the people who are following option #1 in our "Nine Options for Underwater Homeowners".  They are going to Stay and Keep Paying no matter what.  These are also the people who are going to get whatever is left over when the housing collapse finally bottoms out.  We think the bottom will be in late 2014 at the very earliest. 

What this also says is that 1/3 of homeowners polled know they are underwater and believe overwhelmingly (78%) that housing values are not going up in the next year.  If you are underwater and are willing to keep making your payments, we are about 50/50 that your house will be worth more five years from now. 

At the Financial Revival Group, we believe people should know where they are and be prepared to take action to preserve what you have left.  Knowing where you are at with your house value and your mortgage is critical to surviving the economic challenges that are still coming. 

Don't wait to do a little research.  You can download our free EBook on right of the page to help you get started.  

What do you think about these poll results?  You can comment down below.  I want to know what you think too.